On 27.7.2013 23:52, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> On 07/27/2013 11:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> [email protected] wrote: >>>> Author: igor >>>> Date: Wed Jul 24 11:47:23 2013 >>>> New Revision: 11490 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> restored libgee from archive and updated it to 0.6.8 >>> >>> Is 0.6.8 the latest stable version? I see versions for 0.7 (0.7.4), 0.8 >>> (0.8.7), and 0.9 (0.9.0) on the gnome ftp site. >>> >>> Or is 0.6.8 needed for a specific reason? > >> 0.6 and 0.10 are currently stable and maintained versions (libgee-1.0 >> and libgee-0.8 respectively - strange versioning, I know). I guess >> package needs libgee-1.0 and not libgee-0.8. > > Hmm. I see: > > July 12, 2013 > Libgee 0.10.2 released > Libgee 0.8.7 released > > July 10, 2013 > Libgee 0.11.4 released > > July 3, 2013 > Libgee 0.11.0 released > > I don't see anything about stable/development versions but staying with > the gnome even-stable methodology, it appears that current is 0.10.2. >
GNOME uses that one, but nothing left of GNOME in the book needs libgee. > What uses it? I don't see anything in BLFS except in archived packages. > The changelog mentions lxde, but that's not in the book. Is that > being worked? > > -- Bruce > I suppose Igor is working on it since he added back libgee. If not, I don't see the point of keeing the package in the book. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
