Em 24-12-2013 10:32, Igor Živković escreveu: > On 12/24/2013 12:45 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >> Before your post and due to Pierre's reply, I decided to do a last >> investigation. Not sure if it concludes pcre should or not be >> "Optional". All applications installed by wireshark-1.10.5 are linked to >> pcre directly. > > Not really. You're seeing libpcre.so in ldd output because > libglib-2.0.so links to it. > > A better tool for such purposes is, for example, scanelf from pax-utils: > > $ scanelf -BF "%f: %n" capinfos dftest dumpcap editcap mergecap randpkt > rawshark reordercap text2pcap tshark wireshark > > capinfos: > libwiretap.so.3,libwsutil.so.3,libgmodule-2.0.so.0,libglib-2.0.so.0,libgcrypt.so.11,libpthread.so.0,libc.so.6
... This scanelf is very good, thanks. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
