On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Armin K. <kre...@email.com> wrote: > On 12/27/2013 06:26 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >> OK. For trunk, I really don't see a problem keeping the symlinks for >> convenience. >> >> -- Bruce > > I'm strict to following standards when it comes to them, so that's why I > am doing (unnecessary) modifications :P > >
I consider the /usr/man to /usr/share/man to be a compatibility symlink from an old location to a new location. But I would prefer to see packages target the preferred locations (where it makes sense [simple, and can possibly be submitted upsteam]) instead of working because we have the symlink in place. (Just adding my $0.02, I've lived with /usr/info and /usr/man for the last decade. I suppose I can live with it a little longer) -- Nathan Coulson (conathan) ------ Location: British Columbia, Canada Timezone: PST (-8) Webpage: http://www.nathancoulson.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
