Le 29/01/2014 23:23, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> >> >> Shouldn't the bootscripts be updated to take that into account ? >> [...] >Personally, I think this update should wait until some other > change is needed. It is basically dead code because nothing we have > now would use it and if installed, it wouldn't work with the > present bootscripts anyway. It's OK to update svn, but don't > increment blfs-bootscripts-version in general.ent. That way a new > bootscripts tarball won't be generated.
Thanks Bruce. That was something I wanted to ask after being sure that the modification would be done: what about bootscripts policy? I have now the answer without asking. Dead code is a bad thing when you try to understand what is done by scripts, which I had to, because I installed a virtual network (using sockets in qemu) between virtual machines, and I wanted to set up bridging and NAT. (want to test krb5 over a network, non just inside a single machine) So I'll remove any reference to /etc/sysconfig/network-services from svn, for taking effect at the next version bump. I won't remove pppoe scripts nor the install-service-pppoe target. Regards Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
