On 02/04/2014 06:54 PM, Armin K. wrote: > On 02/04/2014 06:26 PM, Igor Živković wrote: >> On 2014-02-04 18:18, Armin K. wrote: >>> http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2013/debconf13/webm-high/983_Why_Debian_should_or_should_not_make_systemd_the_default.webm >>> >>> >>> Lennart managed to explain why/why not should Debian (but can be applied >>> to many other distros) use systemd by default. He got some interesting >>> points there. Since I noticed that some of you don't really understand >>> what systemd really does except the binary logs, adding bloat and using >>> D-Bus, it might be worth to watch. >> >> >> http://wizardofbits.tumblr.com/post/45232318557/systemd-more-like-shit-stemd >> >> > > Looks interesting, I'll read it later. I did notice lot of UNIX word > usage there, so it's natural that people who still "worship UNIX" are > against systemd.
Not really, people who worship Unix would probably pick one of *BSD. It's more like that some people aren't happy about their systems slowly being turned into the systemd monoculture. -- "LEGO won't be ready for the average user until it comes pre-assembled, in a single unified look, and glued together so it doesn't come apart." -- Iranon -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
