On 02/21/2014 03:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu: >>> #3505: linux-3.13.4 >>> ----------------------+------------------------ >>> Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@… >>> Type: task | Status: new >>> Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.5 >>> Component: Book | Version: SVN >>> Severity: normal | Keywords: >>> ----------------------+------------------------ >>> New point version. >>> >>> We can do this for 7.5. The rule here is that we can update point >>> versions but not major or minor versions. >> >> Couldn't it be the same for blfs, for almost all packages? > > That's worthy of discussion. Perhaps end packages and not libraries > would be amenable to this type of rule. I'm hesitant to update > libraries right now because of possible breakages of programs already > marked as lfs75_checked. For the few packages that are marked > lfs75_built, then there is no good reason not to update. > > Is that a reasonable compromise? > > -- Bruce >
I'd prefer not to touch anything (especially modify dependencies at this late cycle) unless it's really worth upgrading, ie security issues, feature required by some other packages present in newer version but not older, etc. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
