On 27/02/2014 06:23, Ken Moffat wrote: > So, is there any_simple_ test that an editing monkey can run, to > satisfy people that it is "known to build and work properly using an > LFS-7.5 platform" ? In this case, I happen to be running the > testsuite, but the book's comment doesn't fill me with any > confidence that jtregcheck is an adequate test. For programming > languages, which this claims to be, I can hack shell, to an extent, > and on a clear day with the wind in the right direction I might > manage a little perl, but otherwise I'm mostly limited to my > recollections of COBOL, JCL (specifically, JES2), and AMS (Access > Method Services - call it VSAM if you prefer). With iced-tea a pretty adequate test will be to build ant / fop for a solid test building maven+jruby puts it through its paces with extensive test suite. ant is a circular dependancy as you need ant to build icedtea. of course to bootstrap icedtea it uses its self to builld itself this is a test in itself.
Greg -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
