Le 29/04/2014 13:21, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : > Em 28-04-2014 20:22, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: >> Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>> $ cat /etc/lfs-release >>> SVN-20140425 >>> >>> Log is a bit long. >>> >>> I am thinking the problem is with gcc-4.9.0, but have seen reference to >>> older problems with ncurses. >>> >>> Please, I need to help with that. >> >> Did you see: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56145 >> >> It's a little dated, but it does not appear to be fixed. >> >> -- Bruce > > Yes, I saw it before, thanks. > > Tried > > -O1 instead of O3 (CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -O1") > > Then tried: > > CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fwrapv" > > because they say "When adding -fwrapv to the command line it stops gcc > from produce the ice". > > No success at all. > > I don't have enough knowledge to understand all said in the page, so I > am not sure of exactly what could be done. > I have just built lame (not tested) with gcc-4.9.0 I installed for updating, on an LFS 7.5 basis, using instructions in the BFLS book, and only NASM as optional dependency. It builds fine, but I have not tested it.
The difference I notice with your log is the -maccumulate-outgoing-args switch, which I do not have. But I see in the doc that this flag is x86 only, so it might not appear on a 64 bit machine, which I use. The warning about the v_s2 variable is here too, but not the SSE one, nor the error, of course. I have a 64 bit virtual machine under qemu. I see that you have a 32 bit one. The warning about SSE is weird, actually. What do you have for: cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep flags ? Regards Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
