Hello, There are going to be people such as myself who are going to want to use a desktop system like gnome. Removing all references to systemd, would, in my opinion be a very sad thing to do.
You folk have put in a lot of effort with regards to these books, and any knowledge gained from your efforts would be best preserved. Even if it is not a part of mainstream BLFS/LFS, you could even put up a separate wiki with your notes and tips. With kdesu broken, and numerous articles on the web spanning a few years, the only real alternative for a full desktop with working super user privs is gnome, however that is just my opinion. I gave kde a fair go, but there are things that you have to do as root, eg changing the system time and a few other tasks and without a working kdesu it makes the desktop environment almost usesless. Regards, Christopher. On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:29 -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 16-05-2014 06:40, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > > Em 15-05-2014 22:19, Ken Moffat escreveu: > > > >> Should we in-effect revert both these hunks, now that systemd has > >> fallen out of LFS ? A big Thank You to Fernando for documenting in > >> the log that this had changed. > >> > >> ĸen > >> > > > > I think so. Just be safe, it would be good to build without systemd > > switches. This applies to some other packages, I think. First one to > > need the package could fix it, I think. > > > > BTW, I was off line yesterday, something broken in the cable connection, > > ISP support only arrived very late. > > One thing: we could leave there only the command explanations, to help > people trying to build BLFS using systemd. It is something we learned, > and better stay documented. What do you think? > > -- > []s, > Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
