Pierre Labastie wrote:
Would you agree with this comment <!-- there is no libmysqlclient_r.so.xxx shared library, nor libmysqlclient_r.a static lib, only compatibility symlinks to the corresponding "non _r" libraries --> OTOH, I do not have strong feeling about that. Another solution could be to put them back, and write that they are symlinks to the corresponding non _r versions.
Personally, I think the libraries to be listed should be libname.{so,a} as appropriate. Usually the .so version is a symlink to a more explicit version of the library. Of course the .{so.a} versions are only used when linking. The runtime library is usually so.n where n is the library version.
I'd be comfortable here with just listing libmysqlclient.{so,a}, but I can go with listing the _r versions too.
-- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
