Em 26-06-2014 04:54, Pierre Labastie escreveu: > Le 26/06/2014 01:49, Ken Moffat a écrit : >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:23:46PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>> Em 25-06-2014 16:46, [email protected] escreveu: >>>> Author: pierre >>>> Date: Wed Jun 25 12:46:52 2014 >>>> New Revision: 2920 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> Regenerate cacerts patch for icedtea >>>> >>>> Added: >>>> trunk/icedtea/icedtea-2.5.0-add_cacerts-1.patch >>>> >>>> Added: trunk/icedtea/icedtea-2.5.0-add_cacerts-1.patch >>>> ============================================================================== >>>> >>>> --- /dev/null 00:00:00 1970 (empty, because file is newly added) >>>> +++ trunk/icedtea/icedtea-2.5.0-add_cacerts-1.patch Wed Jun 25 >>>> 12:46:52 2014 (r2920) >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,557 @@ >>>> +Submitted By: Fernando de Oliveira <famobr at yahoo dot com dot br> >>> I put my name when I did a simple rediff or just put the LC_ALL=C, can't >>> remember. Please, the guilty one, now, are you. :-) >>> >>>> +Date: 2013-07-13 >>>> +Initial Package Version: 2.4.1 >>>> +Update: Modify instruction creating certificates to use LC_ALL=C >>>> + 2013-07-20 >>>> + Regenerate for version 2.5.0 (P. Labastie, 2014-06-25) >>>> +Upstream Status: Not Submitted >>>> +Origin: DJ Lucas <dj AT linuxfromscratch DOT org>, Bruce Dubbs >>>> (mydate function) >>>> +Description: Allows the build to generate a valid JDK cacerts file >>>> using the >>>> + system installed CA certificates. >>>> + >> When I update a patch, I mostly leave the original submitter and >> add my name and whatever I changed somewhere in the text, often at >> the end. I had not noticed an Update: field - I like the idea, but >> certainly each change ought to have someone credited : although svn >> and git use 'blame' I don't think of it as "who broke it", but "who >> tried to fix it", so I am reluctant to use "guilty", even in this >> sense of "you touched it last, so you are 'it'". [ not sure if that >> will be understood - in a children's game here, the one who gets >> touched becomes "it" until he or she can touch somebody else ]. >> >> ĸen > In France, the game is "jouer au chat" (play "cat"), and the one who is > touched becomes the cat (guess the others are mice) until he or she can > touch somebody else. I like the "Updated" field too. Unless DJ or > whoever put the patch first wants to change, I think we can keep the > patch as is. > Also, the first patch I committed is wrong, and the second attempt is > better but does not do what it is supposed to do, so I am perfectly OK > with the term "guilty".
OK, then I was the wrong one, when I changed to my name. Please, change it back to Submitted By: DJ Lucas <dj AT linuxfromscratch DOT org> -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
