On 25-07-2014 06:55, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> On 24-07-2014 20:22, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:45:41PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>>
>>> Seems reasonable.  I haven't seen your change, but I hope you mention the
>>> security issues openssl has had recently.  AFAIK, only the current (as of
>>> today) version of openssl should be used.
>>>
>>  It went in just now, before I read your reply.  I think that any of
>> 1.0.1h, 1.0.0m, 0.9.8za (latest versions from
>> http://www.openssl.org/news/ ) should be fine.
>>
>>  I used the phrase "the latest version of any currently maintained
>> version of openssl should be satisfactory if already installed" with
>> italics, i.e. <emphasis/> on "currently maintained".  That is on the
>> firefox and xulrunner pages, in the second notes.
>>
>> ĸen
>>
> 
> ĸen,
> 
> Want to do the same addition to Thunderbird, but not sure. I am thinking
> in removing /usr/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload/_ssl.so to test the necessity.
> 

Confirmed same problem with Thunderbird. Will fix the book tomorrow.

-- 
[]s,
Fernando
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to