On 25-07-2014 06:55, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > On 24-07-2014 20:22, Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:45:41PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> >>> Seems reasonable. I haven't seen your change, but I hope you mention the >>> security issues openssl has had recently. AFAIK, only the current (as of >>> today) version of openssl should be used. >>> >> It went in just now, before I read your reply. I think that any of >> 1.0.1h, 1.0.0m, 0.9.8za (latest versions from >> http://www.openssl.org/news/ ) should be fine. >> >> I used the phrase "the latest version of any currently maintained >> version of openssl should be satisfactory if already installed" with >> italics, i.e. <emphasis/> on "currently maintained". That is on the >> firefox and xulrunner pages, in the second notes. >> >> ĸen >> > > ĸen, > > Want to do the same addition to Thunderbird, but not sure. I am thinking > in removing /usr/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload/_ssl.so to test the necessity. >
Confirmed same problem with Thunderbird. Will fix the book tomorrow. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
