On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 06:35:41AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > On 07-08-2014 15:43, Ken Moffat wrote: > >> > > > > I've no idea where you found libsigc++ development (google seems > > not to know), but that patch fixed the build for me. > > I cannot remember all the path used to arrive there. > > Message announcing API break: > > <https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00710.html> > > There, you have the links: > > <https://git.gnome.org/browse/libsigc++2/commit/?id=81c778422768f14eb9ed18645a0a4352dd37c2cb> > > <https://developer.gnome.org/libsigc++/2.2/structsigc_1_1adapts.html> > > <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724496> > > In git gnome, I found the commit and respective patch: > > <https://git.gnome.org/browse/libsigc++2/patch/?id=81c778422768f14eb9ed18645a0a4352dd37c2cb> > > which I used to revert (-R), and make our patch. >
Thanks for spelling that out - I did not see the link, I think I only looked at the detail in the 2.3.2 announcement. Now that I look at mail-archive, I can see that Kjell Ahlstedt has admitted it is a sigc++ bug, with a one-line fix required. Strangely, I subscribed to that list last night but I don't seem to have received any mail. Oh well, here is the commit as a patch : https://git.gnome.org/browse/libsigc++2/patch/?id=df361299c3f9a0922a683e5fa3869764932bb19a So, it looks as if we can forget about the big revert. I'll restore my build to before libsigc++, and try the patched version. If that works, I'll commit it and fix up libsigc++. ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
