On Wed, August 27, 2014 6:15 pm, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Jocelyn Fréchot wrote: > >> On 27/08/2014 00:07, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >> >>> Notice that: >>> >>> >>> first line is *February 2030* second line is *November 2027* >>> >>> Third line should be the first one. i.e, first two lines need to be >>> deleted. >> >> For the record, the two first lines are there for months, or more >> surely years. > > The one dated 2030 appears to be posted around 12 Feb 2002 18:24:01 > The one dated 2027 appears to be posted around 01 Nov 2001 16:32:20 > > > Removing a message is a non-trivial task. The whole database has to be > rebuilt after removing the offending messages. I've done it before for > some messages that had embedded virii, but these are just some users with > bad dates set in their system. > > Is there any particular reason we can't just live with them? > > > -- Bruce > > > > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > >
Yep, mailman databases are truly nasty. I try to avoid messing with them if at all possible. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
