On 08/26/2014 05:05 AM, Christopher Gregory wrote: > On Tue, August 26, 2014 9:00 am, Armin K. wrote: >> After few days of building stuff, I believe I can take a small rest now. >> >> >> If I skip GNOME and KDE 5 sections, there are only 36 packages left to >> be tested. >> >> Most of them are in Postlfs chapter, namely all editors, filesystem >> tools and shells. >> >> Second biggest section is the last one, where I need to finish scanning >> software, two from printing, postscript and typesetting packages. >> >> There are few packages here and there that don't count into any section, >> but that's not important. >> >> Below are the packages that I haven't yet verified: >> >> >> networking/netutils/wireshark-systemd.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> networking/netutils/nmap.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> networking/mailnews/procmail.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> networking/mailnews/re-alpine.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> networking/mailnews/fetchmail.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> networking/mailnews/mailx.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> networking/mailnews/mutt.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/printing/gutenprint.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/printing/cups-filters-systemd.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/typesetting/tl-installer.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/typesetting/texlive.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/scanning/xsane.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/scanning/sane.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/ps/paps.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/ps/a2ps.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/ps/fop.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/ps/enscript.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/ps/epdfview.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> pst/ps/psutils.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> multimedia/libdriv/grilo-plugins-systemd.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/virtualization/qemu-systemd.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/editors/ed.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/editors/emacs.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/editors/joe.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/editors/bluefish.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/editors/vim.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/shells/tcsh.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/shells/zsh.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/shells/dash.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/filesystems/reiser.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/filesystems/sshfs-fuse.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/filesystems/xfsprogs.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/filesystems/jfs.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/filesystems/mdadm.xml: &lfs75_built; >> postlfs/filesystems/gptfdisk.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> postlfs/filesystems/ntfs-3g.xml: &lfs75_checked; >> >> >> If you have built LFS-systemd-7.6-rc1 and you can confirm that any of >> the listed packages work, please let me know. >> >> The number of packages built against LFS-systemd-7.6-rc1 is currently >> 593. >> >> >> Note that this doesn't count GNOME section, as very vew packages are >> checked there. 86 packages remain to be checked, but I believe that's what >> Christopher will do. >> >> >> I may release -rc1 of BLFS systemd soon (tomorrow or day after) as there >> can't be any upgrades without me having to check most of the stuff again, >> which I don't want. >> >> Most packages are up to date, including the ones released today and >> yesterday (if any). >> >> Please report any problems you may find while building packages using >> the instructions from any book. >> >> -- >> Note: My last name is not Krejzi. >> > Hello, > > As this email is on the public list and as I have already advised Armin in > private I will also state it here. > > I am so pissed off that it is hard to even put it into words. > > I was the one who approached Bruce with regards to re-introducing GNOME. > It was NOT YOU. >
Does that mean that only you have the rights to do anything with it? Do you even recall that your work was based of previous editors' work (files from archive)? Not to mention that even your work required no small amount of modifications to get it right, I've just never mentioned it. If you think that only you have rights to work with something just because it was you who (re)introduced it, then BLFS is not really place for you. It's, after all, open source, and everyone has rights to modify and test it. > If I had not started on doing the integration then you probably would have > still been discusssing IF systemd should even have a seperate book. > It was just created because there was another person besides me who wanted to work on it. I could create it myself (and I did once), but it was way too much work for me only (but in the end I ended doing a lot of things myself that I didn't need to, but still no one stepped in). > I stated that I wanted to check sections before you took it on yourself to > just run over my wishes and do it yourself. > Instead of whining about it, you should be thankful because there was another set of eyes and brains testing it. As I sasked earlier, does it really matter if it was me or you who put the lfs76_checked tag, and if, why? What it matters is that it works. No one prevents you from building and testing it and verifing once again that it's done right. > That is NOT how you work with someone. I clearly stated in my email to > you before the rc1 roll out that we should split things between us in > sections, yet you do it ALL. > I apologize that it was in my sincere efforts to deliver the best release possible by checking everything. It won't happen again. > For the NEXT book, I MYSELF will be checking ALL of GNOME and ALL the > dependencies that ANY of the GNOME packages use. > Sure. From now on, the systemd branch is yours to do whatever you please with. You are welcome to modify, update, merge changes the way you please. You also have to plan the next release (and release candidate too). I will, for the time being, step down as the maintainer and editor simply because I can't take the bullshit that I've been getting during the participation in mailing list discussions and doing the editing. I simply wanted everything to be in a good shape, but I can't help it that other people misunderstand (in worst possible ways) and underappreciate my work. > As far as FASTJAR is concerned, if on my build it still REQUIRES it then I > WILL BE ADDING IT BACK ON THE PAGE where it > Many people are smarter than one. You should work with others to find out why is it like that (but I see it has already been solved). .oO(Instead of one drama queen (me), there are 3 now.) -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
