On Mon, September 15, 2014 3:34 am, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > For some reason, just came across your messages, Christopher, and > Wayne's about Seahorse. > > > Sorry about that. > > > I think that the reason is I was focused in modifying the book and this > persistent headache. > > Christopher, do you want to discuss what I've done in the book today? I > could not anymore think very much about your messages (headache), but from > what I saw, I did more or less what you where suggesting. > > Anyway, if you want, I will try to reply today, or, if I need to think > much, will reply tomorrow. > > -- > []s, > Fernando > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Hello Fernando,
There is nothing anyone can do about delays in emial being either sent or recieved. I thought that was the case for you having not replied. I only did a quick look through tcl so that I could offer a few suggestions that you may not have known. I did discover on the tcl website (at least I think it was their website) that they stated that their build script is mearly a wrapper to call in the bundled software. They do not modify the included packages from the originals. It may well be that if we do a similar thing with the other packages that they bundle along with the seds you have modified from arch that the warnings and hard coded links are removed. You have done a far more extensive investigation on it than I have. My only real question is, should the changes you have made to the sqlite instrctions be optional? Prior to this the bundled pakages for tcl were not. I do not know if sqlite integration is considered mandatory for the functionality of tcl or not. Maybe Bruce could also have some input on this as I am only trying to come to grasps with it in my own mind. I would much rather go with the majority on things rather than perhaps wrongly thinking that my way of thinking is the correct one. It is just a shame that this issue cropped up during the release cycle, as if it is decided to go ahead and split out the other bundled packages, it will require quite a bit more work on the tcl page. At least we do not have to create seperate pages for them, but rather just put additional lines of build instructions for them. My main concern with that approach is, will it actually make the build instructions too long? If it did make them look to long then it would be more work creating seperate pages for the bunled packages that are not already in the book. Regards, Christopher. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
