On Sat, 2014-10-04 at 17:50 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Guile install the libguile-2.0.so.22.7.2-gdb.scm file into /usr/lib.
> Since it is not an elf library, it gives a warning when running ldconfig.
> Also, I am not sure it may be found by gdb: reading the gdb documentation, I
> would be inclined to move that file to /usr/share/gdb/auto-load. But I see
> that the file libstdc++.so.6.0.20-gdb.py is (manually) moved to
> /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib, after building gcc. So I am not sure whether
> that should not be the same for libguile-2.0.so.22.7.2-gdb.scm...
> What I am sure about is that files libglib-2.0.so.0.4200.0-gdb.py and
> libgobject-2.0.so.0.4200.0-gdb.py are installed (automatically when the
> respective packages are built) to /usr/share/gdb/auto-load.
> 
> Does somebody know more about this?
> 
> Pierre
> 

Hello,

I am glad you brought this up Pierre.  

I hate that non-elf error when running ldconfig.   I did do a little
research but all that I managed to find at the time was an answer that
it is not an elf file so the warning is correct and is safe to ignore.

It just seems that people who answer on a number of mailing lists just
like to post their own thoughts on things without actually answering the
question about how to properly fix it.  I guess that those answering
just like to think they are important, rather than shutting up and
letting someone who is actually willing and knows what they are talking
about answer the question.

I also do not know if having the file in its current location actually
effects the proper update of subsequently installed files.

I guess that the only way that we may well get a conclusive answer is to
post directly on the main guile developers site and see if we get an
answer.

Regards,

Christopher.

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to