On 29-11-2014 20:02, Christopher Gregory wrote: > Well its come to this. I will no longer report anything that I find does > not compile. What people here are failing to realise is that they are not > actually building against a system that is a totaly new installation with > everything updated to the latest newest versions.
This is true. When we freeze for the next release is the right time for doing that. Doing it in the middle of the terms only delays the updates. >>From now on, if I find that an application on a new installation does not > work, if even previous versions do not work and I am unable to find a > solution on the people who WROTE the programs site then I will drop the > application from systemd branch. Simple as that. I think this is not the best solution, because the applications have a reason to be there, only if not needed anymore, after a discussion we archive. I was just asking you to be more careful, because from the 4 times that you said something was wrong since yesterday, only one was true and it was an upstream problem but they did not have a solution: in short, an upstream bug. I did a simple search in the internet. But that is no big deal. I want to help you if I can, so, please, go on telling what you find, I prefer you doing that than sacrificing your book. Will not complain anymore. And apologies for the other post, I was trying to help, but I think it was not properly written. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
