> I'm not really sure if "General Utilities" was the correct category. It
> contained a library and a command line utility to use that library
> (analogue to libxml2 and xmllint, libxslt and xsltproc, icu and numerous
> icu binaries, etc), that's why I moved it there.
>
> I agree that there are many packages that don't really fit in the
> categories they're in, but since this one was a new package when I
> created the branch, I felt "General Libraries" was the right section
> (because of what I mentioned about libxml2 and libxslt and what not).
>
> I'd like to see what other editors think about this. It's not a big
> deal, I can move it alright.
>
> But, it shouldn't be an issue (and it isn't for me or anyone else it
> seems) since I don't try to follow the systemd book anyways, so having
> different instructions, packages or categories means nothing to me to be
> honest.
Okay, it's good that you are not bothered. So if you follow the sections in BLFS
it will reduce variability and there is no downside.
Thanks
jb.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
