On 12/17/2014 06:30 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 05:47:25PM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>>
>> Small correction - given that they *both* use Glamor (as the card that's
>> being benchmarked is the one driven by radeonsi and such hardware
>> doesn't have EXA, only Glamor acceleration).
>>
>  Very interesting.  Meanwhile, it looks as if glamor will also be
> usable on intel: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/15/948
> 
> ĸen
> 

Or not, at least not with the intel ddx.

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/commit/?id=0aa2edbd29c8dd26a5f3748e3875c445ea358a6d

Who knows, maybe modesetting ddx + glamor outperform the sna enabled
xf86-vieo-intel.

-- 
Note: My last name is not Krejzi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to