On 26-12-2014 19:16, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 26/12/2014 22:41, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit :
>> >From BLFS support:
>>
>> On 26-12-2014 16:54, Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> Le 26/12/2014 20:11, Hazel Russman a écrit :
>>>> I don't remember this happening with earlier versions. Perhaps the module
>>>> should be listed as a recommend.
>>>>
>>> Usually, tests are considered optional, and so are there deps. I agree it
>>> should be listed.
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>
>> Actually, this update, gave up updating the tests, because I had not
>> only 2, but 10 failures. same results either via ssh or in XFCE.
>>
>> $ xzgrep ^FAIL
>> /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/wget-1.16.1-make-k-check-XFCE-2014.12.09-12h38m42s.log.xz
>> $ xzgrep -A9 summary
>> /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/wget-1.16.1-make-k-check-XFCE-2014.12.09-12h38m42s.log.xz
Please forgive me and forget what I said. I was really self-upset for
this mistake that I, after all, didn't really committed. Actually, I had
no errors, at first (compare the times with the tests above):
$ xzgrep -A9 summary
/home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/wget-1.16.1-make-k-check-2014.12.09-12h18m19s.log.xz
Testsuite summary for wget 1.16.1
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 84
# PASS: 84
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================
--
Testsuite summary for wget 1.16.1
============================================================================
# TOTAL: 23
# PASS: 23
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
============================================================================
Problem is that half an hour later, studying the package for the notes
used for the update, I saw that valgrind was introduced, but the tests
with valgrind failed, so that I wrote in the dependencies:
Valgrind-3.10.1 (optional for the test suite, but faliures are
introduced) [need to fix the typo].
After that, in the script, I have:
CONFIGURE="./configure --prefix=/usr \
--sysconfdir=/etc \
--with-ssl=openssl" &&
#--enable-valgrind-tests \
#--with-ssl=gnutls" &&
where the valgrind tests where used only for the failed tests.
> I have installed LWP using cpan, so a bunch of deps have been pulled in, and I
> do not know which ones. That may be the reason why I do not see the failure
> Hazel sees.
I did the same.
> I guess the skipped tests correspond to tests using valgrind, which I have not
> installed.
>
> Well, conclusion is that the test results depend on what is on the computer,
> not on the quality of the package...
Now, I really don't know what to reply to Hazel. Have a little recall of
IO::Socket::SSL being pulled by LWP:
$ sudo cpan -l 2>&1 | grep IO::Socket::SSL
IO::Socket::SSL 2.002
IO::Socket::SSL::Utils 0.03
IO::Socket::SSL::PublicSuffix undef
IO::Socket::SSL::Intercept 1.93
Don't really know how to find it, but probably, IO::Socket::SSL is a
dependency of LWP.
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
