Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
As you might have already noticed, I decided to take the risk of keeping gcc-5.
I think that's reasonable.
Reason I don1t do like Ken: first my scripts are individual. For each package-version I have a package-version.sh. And I keep all old ones in an "old" directory. This lets me compare when things get wrong.
I do the same, although my scripts are executable. I keep both old scripts and old package versions. For instance I was just looking at wget and have:
make-wget-1.13 make-wget-1.13.4 make-wget-1.14 make-wget-1.15 make-wget-1.16.1 And the associated tarballs.
However, this makes building a new system very slow, so, my work updating packages is much better than when I need to start building a new system for tagging. And the consequence is always a lot of tickets accumulated.
Been there, done that.
Thanks again, and please, wish me good luck.
Good luck. However I don't think you need it. You make your own. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
