On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 05:38:16PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > On 01-05-2015 15:31, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > > If we agree, I'll update the book to recommend GLU, turn off building > > the static lib, and turn off demos. > > > > So what we end up with is: > > > > cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \ > > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \ > > -DFREEGLUT_BUILD_STATIC_LIBS=OFF \ > > -DFREEGLUT_BUILD_DEMOS=OFF \ > > Yes, please. Sounds good to me. > > On the other hand, if you choose FREEGLUT_REPLACE_GLUT=ON, does it mean > we could archive freeglut? > > Does it replace the freeglut in the system? If we keep freeglut but it > can be overwritten, some warning is necessary. What do you think? > Sounds risky - if it sounds likely that will be a runner, I would want to build and test asymptote (or preferably, for somebody else to do that ;-) on a system without real freeglut - the kleinbottle4 and torus16 variants in my asy testsuite use freeglut to create png, eps and pdf files.
If I'm going to do that, it will mean building _another_ throwaway system so it will take a few days (both likely machines have things which I need to do on their existing systems). Probably, it will be fine. But sooner or later one of the "easy peasy" changes will again bite us. ĸen -- Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady. Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
