On 19-05-2015 23:28, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > >>> Fernando, if you had used 'svn blame | less' you would probably have >>> spotted that I changed this in r15811. >> >> $ svn blame | less >> svn: E205001: Try 'svn help blame' for more information >> svn: E205001: Poucos argumentos fornecidos > > svn blame ./general/sysutils/unzip.xml > > works for me.
OK, just learned how to do it. But could not find my older commit. >> I was banned from git, because asked there about an error in the tests, >> related to unzip. This was considered a spam. Now, I am in their filter. >> Fortunately, one developer sent me a private message with the fix that I >> included in the book. > > Interesting. However I don't understand the relationship between git > and unzip. Is there a regression test that uses unzip? We don't mention > that. > >> If ou made the change and the git test does not fail, I don't mind, your >> commands are better, if everything is OK, and the unzip tests are not >> very relevant. >> IIRC, what mattered for me was the -DNO_LCHMOD. >> >>> Second, it means what we have identical instructions for i686 and >>> x86_64. I reagard that as a Good Thing.™ >> >> Agree, again, if git tests are OK. > > I agree too. >> Douglas, I will revert my modification tomorrow. My ventilator broke, >> and i'm under more than 35 Celsius. Will do it soon. Was searching the problem I referred to. > I might add that instead of just changing something after a recent > modification by another editor, asking on -dev generally clears things up. Problem was not with git, but with mercurial: http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2014-February/055905.html {{{ $ rm -rf tmp && ./run-tests.py --debug --tmpdir tmp test-archive-symlinks.t ... + unzip archive.zip lchmod (file attributes) error: Function not implemented + echo SALT1391445401.18 35 0 SALT1391445401.18 35 0 + cd zip + echo SALT1391445401.18 36 0 SALT1391445401.18 36 0 + /tmp/mercurial-2.9/tests/readlink.py dangling dangling -> nothing + echo SALT1391445401.18 39 0 SALT1391445401.18 39 0 + cd .. + echo SALT1391445401.18 40 0 SALT1391445401.18 40 0 . # Ran 1 tests, 0 skipped, 0 failed. }}} Then, I received a private post (can forward privately, but here, will remove poster info, don't want to give him trouble): On 03-02-2014 20:12, [Hidden Sender] wrote: > On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 19:58 -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 03-02-2014 14:18, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: >>> RE: [issue2667] failure in test-archive-symlinks.t >>> >>> http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2011-March/028603.html >>> >>> I would like to confirm that I have the same problem. >>> >>> I noticed this problem with version 2.8.2 and it also occurs with >>> version 2.9. >>> >>> Curiously, if I run the test with the --debug switch, it passes, >>> although the apparent source for the error is there "lchmod (file >>> attributes) error: Function not implemented": >> >> ... >> >>> lchmod (file attributes) error: Function not implemented > > This is a known problem with some builds of unzip as shipped by some > distributions. Please complain to your distro and ask them to add > -DNO_LCHMOD to their build.. because Linux doesn't have lchmod. Then I fixed the book for i?86, because the sed was not working as was: [12668]: Fix UnZip-6.0 Instructions. http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/changeset/12668#file0 --- a/trunk/BOOK/general/sysutils/unzip.xml +++ b/trunk/BOOK/general/sysutils/unzip.xml @@ -184,5 +184,5 @@ <screen><userinput>case `uname -m` in i?86) - sed -i -e 's/DASM"/DASM -DNO_LCHMOD"/' unix/Makefile + sed -i -e 's/DASM_CRC"/DASM_CRC -DNO_LCHMOD"/' unix/Makefile make -f unix/Makefile linux ;; The rest is my present problem: 15811 ken <para><parameter>make -f unix/Makefile generic</parameter>: [15995]: More GCC5 Tags Removed non-existent unzip test suite 15999 fernando <para>To test the results, issue: <command>make check</command>.</para> Going to send a private mail about gnupg, then revert my commit, and reply to this. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
