On 08-06-2015 11:17, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 08/06/2015 15:28, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit :
>> I think Pierre is right, but still, shouldn't we also "unrecommend" >> openssl or remove it from the page, or state that it breaks wget? >> > I agree, although the problem with such statements is that they remain > even when things are fixed. I do not know for you, but I usually do not > test things which are supposed to be broken... > > Maybe a statement like "the combination wget-1.16.3—openssl-1.0.2 > is broken" (not using "&version" entities). Yes, good idea! Please, would you mind doing that at night, when fixing or not ant? So, there would be the advantage that more people would have the opportunity to comment, if they wish. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
