Isn't Xfce supposed to be moving into GTK+-3.x anyway? The BLFS root project may not have GNOME per say, but it does have a lot of the software packages that can be used with Xfce very readily. Plus, it would be portable between the core and systemd books.
Just my $0.02. -Jim -----Original Message----- From: "Ken Moffat" <[email protected]> Sent: 6/30/2015 4:58 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [blfs-dev] gst-plugins (0.10) --with-gtk=3.0 : remove the switch ? I was fixing up the bad plugins for gcc5, and somewhat shocked to discover that both gst-plugins-bad-0.10.23 and gst-plugins-good-0.10.31 have '--with-gtk=3.0' and the explanation "Build against GTK+ 3 instead of the default GTK+ 2; recommended for a GNOME Desktop." Even worse, according to svn blame, I am the guilty one (r9272 for the bad plugins). But looking at trac I can see that happened when I was adding the gnome-3 stuff that Wayne had been working on - before then, we apparently did not have the bad plugins. So, I guess that at the time it was the right thing to do. Now we do not really enable a gnome desktop, and anybody who did build one would be using the current (1.4) series. So, I think this is just something which has got left over. Any objections to me removing that switch ? ĸen -- This one goes up to eleven! -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
