On 5.7.2015 22:25, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 07:59:23PM +0200, Armin K. wrote:
On 5.7.2015 19:40, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 05.07.2015 15:24, Armin K. wrote:
With this info, it might be worth investigating what else in BLFS relies
on GStreamer-0.10 and would it be finally time to nuke it for good.
[...]
Still, xfce4 mixer remains. Maybe it should just be replaced with BLFS
pnmixer that Ken added.
The only mixer I use is alsamixer. I do not have a problem with
archiving xfce4-mixer. There is kmix too, but I suspect many who want
xfce do not want to build the kde libraries.
pnmixer only depends on GTK+2 and alsa-utils, but might need a startup file
for Xfce4. Looked fairly simple last time I checked it.
On one of my desktops I tend to use xfce, and pnmixer, but at the
moment that box is running icewm (no xfce on the latest build) and
I'm using it to run a backup, so for the moment I can't check. But
I don't recall having to add anything to get pnmixer to appear in
the xfce menu.
Menu yes. But systray probably no. It needs an autostart file in
/etc/xdg/autostart, which I don't recall being installed last time I
checked.
I'd still list gst-0.10 as an external optional dependency in
libreoffice, seamonkey, firefox, thunderbird, and parole.
Is it really worth it? Should we really list deps of obsolete tech that has
been surpressed by something else, and the former isn't in the book?
I think that we have usually dropped obsolete dependencies ? Of
course, once they have gone, it is hard to remember where we have
done this.
ĸen
GTK+1 and Qt3 come to my mind.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
