On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:08:45AM -0500, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > On Jul 16, 2015 11:06 AM, "Ken Moffat" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:00:00AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > Armin K. wrote: > > > > > > >> GCC-5.2.0 has been released and is a bugfix update to the stable > GCC-5 > > > >> series. > > > > > > >Mainly for Bruce, but others are free to participate: > > > > > > > >Glibc-2.22 is planned for July 31st. I could handle both at that time > if > > > >you're not in a hurry and want to get this release in the book asap. > > > > > > > >But, given the past Glibc release history, it could easily slip up to > > > >mid August. > > > > > > I'll go ahead and get it in the book sometime this weekend. I'd like to > > > have it tested a bit before glibc. We will need to update BLFS for this > > > too. > > > > > > I don't recall which packages needed workarounds for gcc-5.1, but there > is a > > > possibility that those workarounds are no longer necessary. > > > > > > -- Bruce > > > > > In general, I think the main problem was extra output from the > > preprocessor (e.g. the gnulib tests, and probably perl) and that was > > apparently deliberate. > > > > ĸen > > -- > If I recall correctly, the only package that had issues with build-wise > with 5.1 was Ncurses-5.9. Other than that, I cannot recall anything else. > > Douglas R. Reno
Looking at my scripts to see where gcc 5 was mentioned, there is also one of the tests in glibc (I don't recall the issue), and gst-plugins-bad which again was caused by the extra preprocessor output. ĸen -- This one goes up to eleven! -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
