Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I have 5 working machines running Gnu/Linux, only this host is not running systemd.
That's 4 more than I have.
LFS and BLFS have separated ticket systems and e-mail lists. This should be the same for BLFS and BLFS systemd.
There is way too much overlap for that. It would lead to duplicate effort for too many people.
Then, I woke up with a surprising complete change of the books, when I had been agreed that it would'nt be necessary: packages.ent and gnome.ent are born. I wouldn't be against, but why the necessity to do it behind all backs? It was a strctural change of the book, not a misplaced comma.
I didn't care for that change either. I completely agree that it was too invasive a change without discussion first.
When the last editor stepped down the systemd book, immediately Douglas decided to take over, but wanting to be at the same time at BLFS. What? Aren't the whole systemd LFS and systemd BLFS enough?
Yes, but new people have to learn for themselves. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
