Em 08-09-2015 06:17, [email protected] escreveu: > Today, when I was testing my LXQT environment, I found the command "Compress" > in the pop-up menu. Then I selected a file and click it but nothing was > happened. > With the help from LXQT web site, I knew I had to set a file archiver for the > pcmanfm (In the PCManFM file Manager, select > Edit->Preferences->Advanced->Archiver integration). > > Currently pcmanfm supports the following archivers only: > > File-roller (Gnome) > xarchiver (GTK+ 2.x, http://xarchiver.sourceforge.net/) > squeeze (xfce, http://squeeze.xfce.org/) > engrampa (Mate Desktop, https://github.com/mate-desktop/engrampa) > ark (KDE) > > In my case, I used xarchiver for testing because it only requires GTK+ 2.x > package and it is small. > So, please add xarchiver in the BLFS. >
I have tried to use xarchiver instead of file-roller, some years ago, for exactly the same reasons you gave. ISTR that it doesn't work wit xz, and it was a enough for rejecting it, because xz is becoming more and more the most used one. Was going to disagree with you, but found: [http://xarchiver.sourceforge.net/download.html] {{{ You can download the latest stable 0.5.4 release from sourceforge.net. Closed a lot of bugs thanks to the work of Frederick Guerin. You can download the latest stable 0.5.3 release from sourceforge.net. The changelog is the following: Full RAR5 support Full XZ, TAR.XZ support Full Test/Verify support check-for-password-protected-files-on-double-click default-archive-format drag-n-drop_escaped_path fix_7z_support fix-segfault-non-existent-archive-cmdl-switch-x rpm2cpio segfault-open-with mimetype fix-icon-update fix-multiextract fix-unrar-can-add }}} Now my question is for the other developers. I agree with hykwok1. I would like to add http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/xarchiver/xarchiver-0.5.4.tar.bz2 to 7.8. No other one depends on it, so it wouldn't interfere with the freeze. It would be really good having a package not desktop dependent for that. Although I only use command line, most users like file explorers and graphical compressing programs. It doesn't bring any new dependency. It is CMMI, apparently, but reasons for adding it are many. Of course, I will understand and accept if you decide against, based on the same CMMI argument. PS: arch does some tweaks for xfce and for gtk3, so, may be it is not just CMMI. I haven't tried to install it recently. Any objections, please? -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
