Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 19-10-2015 15:28, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Is this OK?
{{{
Optional
...
OpenJPEG-2.1.0 (preference is for OpenJPEG1, due to regressions with
OpenJPEG2)
I looked at that the other day and the log still says:
checking for libjpeg6b... no
checking for libjpeg... -ljpeg
checking jpeglib.h usability... yes
checking jpeglib.h presence... yes
checking for jpeglib.h... yes
checking libjpeg.h works correctly... ok
use libjpeg: yes
...
use libopenjpeg: yes
with openjpeg1
I'm not sure how to interpret that, but it looks like it is saying the
above note may be overcome by events.
problem is that only openjepeg2 is listed as dependency.
What makes sense (not if is the correct one)
1. Both are listed and we we keep the note.
2. Only openjpeg1 is listed, and remove the note?
Option 2, I wrote after seen that your log is catching openjpeg1.
What seems wrong is listing openjpeg2 only as dependency, with or
without a note.
I suppose we could remove OpenJPEG-2, but will poppler try to use it if
the recommended libjpeg-turpo and OpenJPEG-1 are removed?
When I built poppler, I did not have OpenJPEG-2 installed. I think a
quick test would be to install OpenJPEG-2 and remove temporarily
OpenJPEG-1 and then just run the poppler configure and see what it does.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
