On Feb 16, 2016 2:59 PM, "Ken Moffat" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:21:07AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > It looks like we need to change lfs-7.9-rc1 due to security issues: > > > > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-02/msg00416.html > > > > This will result in a new patch for glibc. There are other possible > > packages that will need patches. Please hold off any BLFS tagging for now. > > > > -- Bruce > > I wonder if we should wait for 2.23 ? It looks as if backports will > have to wait, and might take some time (I only glanced at the inline > patch, but it looked "somewhat large" and the tests were in an > attachment to a followup mail. > > I did some tags recently, thought I would check my mail before doing > the next batch - wish I had checked earlier. Do you want me to > alter all the 7.9 tags back to 7.8 (seems easier than 'svn revert' ?) > > ĸen > --
February 18th (2 days) was the release date put out there last month. I honestly am on the fence about this one, however I am leaning towards waiting for 2.23.
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
