----- Forwarded message from Ken Moffat <[email protected]> -----
Yet again, my replies to -book seem to not appear. A quick check showed higgs is idle, so I guess this got filtered to /dev/null. Resending to -dev using my lfs id. Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 19:06:05 +0000 From: Ken Moffat <[email protected]> To: BLFS Book Maintenance List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [blfs-book] r16986 - in trunk/BOOK: . general/graphlib introduction/welcome User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:29:01AM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 20-02-2016 03:34, [email protected] escreveu: > > Author: ken > > Date: Fri Feb 19 22:34:03 2016 > > New Revision: 16986 > > > > Log: > > poppler-0.41.0 : why does editing always take so long ? > > less than 0.4SBU for the tests. > That was a comment on the overall process, not on the test suite. > > @@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ > > > > +<!-- as of 0.41.0, nothing to be done for check > > Not true. > My notes say that I got 'nothing to be done for check' which is consistent with packages which do not have tests. I was surprised, so I commented the relevant text. > > Is your intention to remove all test suites? This could be discussed. > But removing the test suite from poppler without any discussion? > I think we give too much emphasis to many test suites, rather than testing whether a package for which something is a dependency still works. But I commented the text becasue it seemed to me that there was no longer a testsuite. -- This email was written using 100% recycled letters. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
