On 06/09/2016 06:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Douglas R. Reno wrote: >> On 6/9/2016 4:47 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> via blfs-book wrote: >>>> Author: renodr >>>> Date: Thu Jun 9 13:58:33 2016 >>>> New Revision: 17471 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> (systemd) LFS79 Tags >>>> (systemd) Tons of GCC6 Tags >>>> >>>> Modified: >>>> branches/systemd/general.ent >>>> branches/systemd/general/genlib/dbus-glib.xml >>>> branches/systemd/general/genlib/js.xml >>>> branches/systemd/general/genlib/libatasmart.xml >>> >>> I'm not sure how useful those commits are since we are going to a merged >>> source tree. Don't spend your time updating the branch if the file is >>> already in trunk. > >> OK. I would still like to do package updates, since that is what the >> users >> see. I can save tags for things until they hit trunk. > > DJ, When do you think we will be able to use trunk for the nightly > systemd builds? > > -- Bruce
I'm unsure. I originally had planned to have most of the merges complete (excluding the DEs) by late Friday night, but then life happened and I've lost the majority of two nights (except late), so it is looking more like Saturday night now. Realistically, I think we should probably wait at least until Gnome is merged (else we break Gnome for systemd), and possibly even after the KF5 update. Unfortunately, I've been focusing exclusively on the merge and have been absolutely no help to Douglas WRT to the package updates to bring systemd Gnome up to date with SysV so that merging can begin there (or even backporting changes from trunk). As to the others, KF5/Plasma, though out of date in systemd, is pretty agnostic WRT sysv/systemd -- two packages differ IIUC--not much dependence on systemd, so not much removed in SysV, maybe some CK2 removal for systemd builds, haven't really looked into it much beyond my previous investigation of CK2 with elogind so that KDM and the new functionality can be (re)introduced. LXDE is already pretty close (if not correct already), just remove the CK2 for systemd lxsession (which I think I already did). Same for XFCE, and although I haven't looked at LXQT, I'd expect similar there. Most of the remaining merges is text only. Gnome is the big pain point, and the one existing users are most vocal about. I'm anxious to get all of the other merges done so I can get back to actually building something. :-) HTH --DJ -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
