On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 04:04:43PM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: > > That symlink dates back to when 64bit Linux was first introduced to LFS, and > made a good deal of sense at the time. The toolchain used to be a PITA WRT > changing the default lib search paths. Not so much anymore. We should > probably take a look at that on next release cycle, make sure lib is > preferred, maybe even drop /lib64 completely, even if we don't kill the > compatibility symlink (which I'd personally like to see go). >
Sounds good, but so does using gold. So much to do, so little time: I'm still hoping to propose changes to the font handling in BLFS, but analyzing modern fonts is taking for ever. ĸen -- `I shall take my mountains', said Lu-Tze. `The climate will be good for them.' -- Small Gods -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
