DJ Lucas wrote:
So, I had a need for current Flash Player, i.e., Chromium. It's a monster,
rivaling WebKit (it actually includes it), but during the compile time, I
did a preliminary page for Chromium (along with several revisions along
the way). Note, I've only done minimal testing thus far (the page for
which I needed Flash Player, the flash player version page, Netflix, and
some of the Google Apps), but it seems to work well. It still needs a bit
of clean up before it's BLFS book quality (contents and command
explanations need to be added, and I need to check validity of i686
builds). Is there any interest in this actually being added to BLFS? It
adds only one small dependent package (ninja, which might be needed by the
next version of WebKit anyway), but the release cycle is about equivalent
with Firefox (fairly frequent releases with some similar deps and included
packages).
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/BLFS-Chromium/xsoft/chromium.html
Looks very complex. I think the only thing that rivals this is Firefox,
but this looks about twice as complex.
When I think I *need* something that uses Flash, I just add it and then
remove it. That's pretty rare though.
I suppose I may try it with -j12 though.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
