On 08/10/2016 12:20, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 11:44 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: >> On 08/10/2016 10:56, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> There is something not right about this version. >>> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/boost/boost_1_62_0.tar.bz2 >>> >>> blfs md5sum 21ff584b29094aa78c607f27cf296af3 >>> When I download from blfs link, I get c0a85b9674794c1b6f6631181945a745 >>> The md5sum on Sourceforge is 5fb94629535c19e48703bdb2b2e9490f >>> If I download using this link, >>> https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/boost/boost/1.62.0/boost_1_62_0.tar.bz2 >>> I get 5fb94629535c19e48703bdb2b2e9490f which matches what is on >>> Sourceforge. It also matches Gentoo's sha256sum. >>> I've made a diff of the two versions and they are vastly different (80Mb+ >>> diff file). >>> >>> Regards, >>> Wayne. >>> >> >> Looks like they modify their packages without modifying their versions... See >> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-book/2016-October/063415.html >> >> Or maybe sourceforge is doing something weird. BTW, where do you find md5sums >> on sourceforge? >> >> Pierre >> >> >> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.62.0/ > > then click on the i icons.
Thanks > > Just discovered that the 218f16bc6e44c530c036ba1021332ed7 sum is part of this: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.62.0.beta.2/ I am sure I used the link in the book (using automated buildscripts extraction from the book), and that link does not reference any beta.2 file... So at the time, the link in the book was pointing to beta.2. And now ?? I guess we have to change the link in the book. But not sure, so waiting for input. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
