On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:10:27PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: > > Howdy all. You might have noticed the nosym branches in SVN. This removes > > the /usr/lib64 symlink and replaces the /lib64 symlink with a directory > > containing only the symlinks to the dynamic loader for x86_64. > > > I think we can probably put this in trunk as it is simpler than the symlinks > we have now and will avoid all those 'seems to be moved' warnings. >
I haven't even looked at it, but that sounds reasonable. > I'm also thinking that this may be a big enough conceptual change (it's not > really a dramatic change in instructions) to make this LFS 8.0. If we do > that, we should probably do it now so we have a lot of experience with it > when we do the final tests for a March release. > > What do you think? > I agree, it 'sounds' very different, even if the details turn out to be much the same (and simpler). ĸen -- `I shall take my mountains', said Lu-Tze. `The climate will be good for them.' -- Small Gods -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
