On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 01:13:46PM -0500, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Various bug reports, and a comment on one at ubuntu suggested trunk > > was fixed in bzr r15477. So I built that tool and eventually > > managed to get a download : > > bzr -Ossl.ca_certs=/etc/ssl/ca-bundle.crt branch lp:inkscape > > > > Pulled out that revision. But trunk is severely different from the > > 0.92 branch. A couple of the diffs were already applied in 0.92, but > > after that the changes were so great that I could not work out which > > parts might be useful. > > > > Fedora have moved to a later (apparently random) bzr snapshot. > > > > I seem to have got r15697, is it worth me trying to build that ? > > There is no autogen.sh, so now it is cmake only. > > > > ĸen > > > > Good afternoon, > > I'd recommend trying it. I'm not having any issues with Inkscape right now > on my ThinkPad (GCC7 based), but I really don't use it often enough for me > to test it thoroughly.
I don't understand your not having issues: for me it fails to build. But I too do not claim to test it thoroughly, although I _do_ have deps which upstream recommends and which we haven't put in the book yet, and my testing is with cmake (got to follow upstream if they aren't being silly). But in the end I decided to see how many errors there were (the upstream commit also fixed a lot of warnings so that trunk should build cleanly). To my surprise, only two sets of similar "overloaded abs is ambiguous" errors in one file. ĸen -- I live in a city. I know sparrows from starlings. After that everything is a duck as far as I'm concerned. -- Monstrous Regiment -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
