Douglas R. Reno wrote:
On Nov 28, 2017 9:38 AM, "Bruce Dubbs" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The alpine package does not seem to be maintained any more. It was originally developed by the University of Washington but they say they no longer distribute it. The url we are using says: "Website is temporary sleeping" and they want the owner to upgrade to a commercial account. I checked Arch and they point to the same url we are using. I can point the book's url to one of our copies, but wonder how many users actually build/use it. I am considering dropping alpine from the book. We do still have mutt as a text mode email client. Opinions? -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html <http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html> Unsubscribe: See the above information page I use 'pico' occasionally, which is part of alpine IIRC
pico is a small text editor. Surely nano does the same thing. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
