Am Donnerstag, den 07.12.2017, 00:02 -0600 schrieb Bruce Dubbs: > I've been looking at removing .la (libtool archive) files from > LFS/BLFS. > ... Hi, do I get that all right, the .la files can be ommited? So when building a fresh install, removing all and any .la would solve problems about missing .la files? In other words, as long as there is "not a single one" .la file present, there will be no issue?
Currently i tried to build lightdm - and it fails as libgobject-blah.la is not present. make[2]: Verzeichnis \u201e/tmp/lightdm/build/lightdm- 1.24.0/liblightdm-gobject\u201c wird betreten CC liblightdm_gobject_1_la-greeter.lo CC liblightdm_gobject_1_la-system.lo CC liblightdm_gobject_1_la-language.lo CC liblightdm_gobject_1_la-layout.lo CC liblightdm_gobject_1_la-power.lo CC liblightdm_gobject_1_la-session.lo CC liblightdm_gobject_1_la-user.lo CCLD liblightdm-gobject-1.la /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.la: No such file or directory libtool: error: '/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.la' is not a valid libtool archive make[2]: *** [Makefile:560: liblightdm-gobject-1.la] Fehler 1 make[2]: Verzeichnis \u201e/tmp/lightdm/build/lightdm- 1.24.0/liblightdm-gobject\u201c wird verlassen make[1]: *** [Makefile:484: all-recursive] Fehler 1 make[1]: Verzeichnis \u201e/tmp/lightdm/build/lightdm-1.24.0\u201c wird verlassen make: *** [Makefile:416: all] Fehler 2 Whats the "standard" way to get around those issues? -- Thomas -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
