On 10/01/2018 16:28, Allard Welter wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Pierre Labastie <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 09/01/2018 17:51, Allard Welter wrote: > > > LVM2-2.02.177 -> Installation of LVM2 > > check_local creates devices in /tmp which is rw,nosiud,nodev > > and subsequently fails all tests. I had to do > > mount -o remount,rw tmpfs /tmp/ > > for the tests > > Is it the systemd book? > > > yes.
I do not do systemd. I guess I'll have to some day, but there is a learning stage I'm reluctant to spend time with. > > > > > --- > > cURL-7.57.0 -> Installation of cURL -> Dependencies > > libmetalink is listed as optional in the dependencies, but an explicit > > --with-libmetalink to configure is required to include it. > > --- > > Actually, we try to put in the optional dependencies of a package, > anything > that can be used by that package. As written on the "Notes on Building > Software" page, we often describe what functionality is added by the > dependency. But we almost never give the instructions to include the > optional > dependencies. > > > Ok. It's just that the way the instructions are written, i.e. suitable for > copy > & paste into a terminal, most readers will not see the configure summary. They > will continue thinking the optional dependency was used. I check the configure > log, so really I'm just pointing this out in case it's worth considering. > Maybe we should be more explicit that when including optional deps, users are on their own. We only test recommended deps (on a regular basis). Not enough man power to test everything. > > > > > cURL-7.57.0 -> Installation of cURL -> Note > > current stable LFS is ld-2.26 > > But recent versions of LFS do not strip ld-2.xx. ld-2.23 is the last > which was > stripped... > > > Perhaps run ldconfig after linking to ld...dbg > > > > Not sure it is needed. And the note is becoming obsolete anyway. > > > Any binary linking from the non.dbg will fail when the link is changed. > You're right (I'd never tested before, because I replaced the non-dbg version with the dbg one, and that did not need ldconfig). Now, I think the note should just be removed... Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
