Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all

I saw that some pages have been marked in LFS as checked with lfs 8.2 and as I'm currently also building blfs svn from lfs 8.2 rc, I thought it might be of interest/help to report the packages I have successfully built like this:


001-rpcbind    008-which    015-rsync         022-logrotate  029-lynx
002-nfs-utils    009-txt2man  016-dialog      023-iptables   030-glib
003-python    010-gdb      017-event         024-json-c     031-mc
004-pcre    011-lpm      018-wget         025-xml2        032-icu
005-mozcacerts    012-strace   019-ntp         026-lmdb        033-boost
006-git        013-joe      020at         027-bind        pkg.txt
007-net-tools    014-popt     021-vixie-cron  028-mkinitrd

- git
- net-tools
- which
- gdb
. joe
- popt
- rsync
- libevent
- ntp
- logrotate
- iptables
- json-c
- xml2
- ldbm
- bind
- lynx
- glib
- mc
- icu
- curl
- fuse (both 2 and 3, there is a conflict in a manpage being the same in both)
- mdadm
- pam

Thank you.

The fuse page needs to be in both because users may not install both, but IIRC the actual page is the same.

  -- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to