On 24/03/2018 20:40, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On 24/03/2018 14:20, [email protected] wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018, Ryan Marsaw wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2018, Pierre Labastie wrote: >>> >>>> On 23/03/2018 20:22, Ryan Marsaw wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Samba 4.8.0 requires libtirpc. Without it, the configuration stage >>>>> fails with the following: >>>>> >>>>> This is related to the same issue involving rpcsvc-proto. One of the >>>>> dependencies of Samba is libnsl, which itself requires rpcsvc-proto and >>>>> libtirpc. libnsl pulls in libtirpc. However, the former is not a >>>>> required dependency, while the latter is. >>>> >>>> Hmm, the question is whether all those libraries are required, or only >>>> recommended. That is, is there an option to disable them somehow, or should >>>> they be present unconditionally for the configuration to succeed? >>>> >>>> From what I can see, there is no option to disable libtirpc from Samba. >>> Those libraries must be on the system, otherwise there's an error at >>> configuration stage. >> I came to the same conclusion. In earlier Samba versions it was possible to >> disable those, but with 4.8.0 I did not find a way. Examples: >> --without-quotas removed the libtirpc dependency in the past and >> --without-ads removed the openldap dependency in the past for me. >> >> Without rpcsvc-proto the usage of rpcgen will fail in the build process >> nowadays. >> >> Uwe > > Thank you all for your contributions. IIUC, libtirpc and rpcsvc-proto are both > required (cannot be disabled), while libnsl is just optional (to use nis). > I'll promote libtirpc to required. At the same time, I'll change the command > to add LDFLAGS. >
Done at revision 19997 Pierre PS Tim, I'm still looking for what may be different on your system and on mine, allowing you to compile without setting xFLAGS, while I need to. Do you use systemd? -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
