On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 06:21:25PM -0500, Alain Toussaint via blfs-dev wrote: > > > 3.30 it is then. After sending the message, I did think about the > > possibility of odd releases being development release while even > > release are stable ones... > > I also took the occasion to modify my ALFS setup to install LibreOffice > 6.1.3.2 while at it. If LO work fine on my setup, I'll modify the > various xml files relevant as well as the package.ent (which is already > done for gnome and gnome.ent before feeding it to jhalfs) file and > submit back. > > Alain
You don't mention fixes for poppler-0.71.0 in LO ? Given how long it takes to build, I picked up both the poppler patches from Arch with 6.1.2 rather than wait to confirm the failure. Actually, at first I only picked up the 0.71.0 patch, and it failed fairly quickly : they give libreoffice 6.1.3 a suffix (I forget what, but all the first matches are for it, the alternative there is libreoffice-stable which is much older). The 0.71.0 patch was specifically diffed against 6.1.2.1 so I had some confidence it would help. ĸen -- If a man stands before a mirror and sees in it his reflection, what he sees is not a true reproduction, but a picture of himself when he was a younger man. -- de Selby -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
