On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:41:19PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 12/20/2018 10:29 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 2018-12-20 10:45 -0600, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On 12/20/2018 06:44 AM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote:
> > > > > > So upstream says it is false by default. I suppose it is for backward > > > compatibility. I think for now we should leave it out until we get a > > > package that complains. > > > > But we *were* using the non-default --with-jpeg8 back in the old autoconf > > times (before r20329). Before r10952 BLFS actually used libjpeg v8d. So > > I think we should kept using v8 ABI. > > I understand we were using it, but where is it being used now? > > -- Bruce Maybe I've misunderstood your question, but everything which uses (system) libjpeg uses it. And we didn't have issues in recent times when that was v8. ISTR I had a local issue in firefox when v8 first came out, but that was years ago. ĸen -- I'm saving up 22 shillings and 10 pence (almost a pound!) per week to buy an ARM-13. http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2018/11/brexit-means-brexit.html -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
