On 6/25/19 11:02 AM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote:
On 25/06/2019 17:20, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote:
On June 25, 2019 7:44:54 AM CDT, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev
<[email protected]> wrote:
I've been building a full BLFS using the elogind branch for the last
few days.
Almost everything built OK. The first issue came with the ~840th
package:
smartmontools-7.0. During configure:
----
[...]
checking for cap-ng.h... no
checking systemd/sd-daemon.h usability... yes
checking systemd/sd-daemon.h presence... yes
checking for systemd/sd-daemon.h... yes
checking for sd_notify in -lsystemd... no
configure: error: libsystemd headers found but library is missing
----
Indeed, there is no libsystemd in either /lib or /usr/lib. But there is
a
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libsystemd.pc, pointing to "-lelogind". the
configure
script does not use libsystemd.pc, but I have been able to build the
package with:
sed -e 's/\[systemd\]/[elogind]/' \
-e 's/-lsystemd/-lelogind/' \
-i configure.ac &&
autoreconf -fiv &&
./configure ...
I'm new to elogind, so there is maybe a better alternative.
Bruce covered the easier way, but optionally, we could create a symlink for
libsystemd. A couple of distros do exactly that, but I was really trying to
avoid it (of course, I'd have preferred to avoid the PC symlink as well, but
that brought too many patches). Really the test should be fixed, I'll look into
upstreaming a test case for elogind at some point, but not sure about timeframe
for it to get into a release, same for Xorg (though the PC symlink works for
it).
Otherwise, there is a bunch of files installed in
/usr/lib/systemd/user:
-------
at-spi-dbus-bus.service
emacs.service
evolution-addressbook-factory.service
evolution-calendar-factory.service
evolution-source-registry.service
evolution-user-prompter.service
gnome-shell.service
gnome-shell-wayland.target
gnome-shell-x11.target
thunar.service
xfce4-notifyd.service
-------
I guess those are missing some --with-systemduserunitdir switch or so.
Yes, that is the correct fix (with =no).
--DJ
The build is finished now. No other issues during build. But I have not run
tests (jhalfs does not do a good job at running them), I've found some issues
with docs, which I am almost sure have nothing to do with elogind, and I'll
have to test that everything runs... I have a question though. I've seen that
consolekit is still in the elogind branch. Is it needed? If not, I suggest
removing/archiving it (I've not built it).
For the run tests, I'm not sure what to test. I may launch lightdm and try to
run DE's from it, but even the systemd book has issues with some DE's, so I
expect this one to have issues too (and also the present sysv book).
Those are Display Manager issues. I test via startx with:
$ cat .xinitrc
session=${2:-xfce}
dbus="dbus-launch --exit-with-session"
ck="ck-launch-session dbus-launch --exit-with-session"
case $session in
fluxbox ) exec startfluxbox ;;
icewm ) exec icewm-session ;;
openbox ) exec openbox-session ;;
sawfish ) exec sawfish ;;
kde5|plasma ) exec $ck /opt/kf5/bin/startkde ;;
xfce|xfce4 ) exec startxfce4 --with-ck-launch ;;
lxde ) exec ck-launch-session startlxde ;;
lxqt ) $dbus /opt/lxqt/bin/startlxqt ;;
lxqt2 ) exec /opt/lxqt/bin/startlxqt ;;
gnome ) $dbus /usr/bin/gnome-session ;;
twm ) xterm -g 80x40+0+0 &
xclock -g 100x100-0+0 &
twm
;;
# No known session, just say so
*) echo "Cannot run $1" ;;
esac
=========
I think where we are now is good enough for the switch. I'll plan to
start that on Thursday about 2 PM CDT (7 PM GMT), unless we have a show
stopper come up before that.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
