On 8/14/19 3:23 PM, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote:
Now that we have gone with the fix which upstream glibc are using re
the linux-5.2 headers changes, should we not just extirpate the
SIOCGSTAMP seds and archive the xinclude member I set up to explain
them ?
There are references in:
xincludes/SIOCGSTAMP.xml
x/lib/qtwebengine.xml (commented)
x/lib/qt5.xml (active)
general/sysutils/bluez.xml (commented)
xsoft/graphweb/firefox.xml (active, and pulls in the xinclude)
Lets comment qt5 and firefox. We can leave the xinclude for now. It we
don't use it, there is no harm in leaving it in the xinclude directory.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
