On 14/09/2019 17:03, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 9/14/19 12:46 AM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote: >> >> >> On 9/13/2019 7:32 PM, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: >>> On 9/13/19 5:52 PM, DJ Lucas via blfs-dev wrote: >>>> Subject says it all. It changed sometime between 6.2.0 and 6.3, but nobody >>>> noticed the issue on the firewall page. It read well enough I guess, >>>> though it's painfully obvious that it is wrong now. Other examples in the >>>> book work as expected. Fortunately, this is the only page in the book >>>> where this syntax was used. >>> >>> That's interesting. Checking, what we have is valid docbook xml. It must >>> be something in our stylesheets. >>> >>>> >>>> I'm planning on overhauling this page soon anyway, just providing an >>>> introduction and pointing to the iptables and nftables pages where the >>>> actual configuration is done and supplying the sect3 title. >>> >>> That would be good. Thanks. >> >> Here is a *very* preliminary patch of that work. I'd appreciate any feedback >> and suggestions for text/configurations. I haven't tested the changes (the >> additions are incomplete for the masquerading example for iptables). If >> anybody has done the other two examples for nftables, or has used firewalld, >> please post simple samples. >> >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/blfs-book/ >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/blfs-systemd/ >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/add-nftables.svnstash > > It's been a *very* long time since I looked at the firewall rules. > > Why are we using ppp for the interface parameters? That seems to be last > century. Shouldn't it be eth+ or similar? >
Hmm, I still have an ADSL box, so pppoe for me. Note that the box is provided by the ISP anyway, so I do not have much access to the firewall parameters. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
