I'm just updating my scripts to the end of January (to find existing
problems before new glibs and binutils). I'm not at all sure about
what we have for pycairo, and I wonder if something in this area
contributed to Stuart's problems with gimp last week.
What specifically looks wrong is:
1. pycairo (1.19.0) still has python2 as a dep ?
2. For packages which need python2 pycairo, we point to pycairo but
here we say "use the same instructions but for 1.18.2'.
I think it would a a LOT clearer if the python2 version was on a
separate xml page (obviously, in the html all modules appear on the
same page), and the links were fixed ?
ĸen
--
We had folksingers in the lower bar for six months back home where
I worked. In the end we had to get a man in with a ferret.
-- Polly, in "Interesting Times"
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
